Phone Comparisons: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 Vs OPPO Find N2
There are quite a number of brochures on the market today. Unfortunately, most of them are still exclusive to China. The same goes for the OPPO Find N2, but if you plan to import it, this phone has a lot going for it. This time we will compare it with other Samsung Foldables. We will compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 with OPPO Find N2.
We previously compared OPPO's new foldable device to the Galaxy Z Fold 4, but this time we're going to do something a little different. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Find N2 have much less in common than the Fold 4 and Find N2. However, both are compact when folded and both are foldable devices, which gives us enough reasons to compare them. So if you're thinking about getting one of these, read on.
adjustment
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 | OPPO search N2 | |
| screen size | Main: 6.7-inch FullHD+ Dynamic AMOLED screen (foldable, 120 Hz) Secondary (coverage): 1.9-inch Super AMOLED display (flat, 60 Hz) | Main: 7.1-inch FullHD+ LTPO AMOLED (foldable, 120Hz) Secondary (attached): 5.54-inch FullHD+ AMOLED display (right side: 120Hz) |
| screen resolution | Basic: 2640x1080 Secondary (Capertina): 260 x 512 | Main: 1792x1920 Secondary (Capertina): 2120 x 1080 |
| SoC: | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| RAM: | 8 GB (LPDDR5) | 12 GB/16 GB (LPDDR5) |
| STORAGE | 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB (UFS 3.1), not expandable | 256GB/512GB (UFS 3.1), not expandable |
| reverse camera | 12 MP (f/1.8 aperture, 24mm lens, 1.8μm pixel size, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF) 12 MP (f/2.2 aperture, 123-degree FoV, 1.12 µm pixel size, ultra-wide) | 50 MP (f/1.8 aperture, OIS, 24mm wide-angle lens, 1.0mm pixel size, omni-directional PDAF) 32MP (telephoto, f/2.0 aperture, 47mm lens, 2x optical zoom, 0.8um pixel size, PDAF) 48MP (Ultraide, f/2.2 aperture, 14mm lens, 0.8μm pixel size, 115 degree FoV) Hasselblad color calibration |
| front camera | 10 MP (f/2.4 aperture, 26 mm lens, 1.22 µm pixel size) | Primary: 32MP (f/2.4 aperture, 22mm lens) Frame: 32MP (f/2.4 aperture, 22mm wide lens) |
| Battery: | 3700mAh Wired Charging Non-portable 15W Wireless Charging Reverse Wireless Charging 4.5W Charger not included | 4520 mAh non-removable fast charging with 67W inline, 10W reverse inline charger is included |
| Size: | Open dimensions: 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1mm | Open dimensions: 132.2 x 140.5 x 7.4 mm Folded: 132.2 x 72.6 x 14.6 mm |
| Heavy | 187 grams | 233/237 grams |
| connection | 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C | 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C |
| security | Side fingerprint scanner | Side fingerprint scanner |
| Operating System | Android 12: User Interface 4.1.1 | Android 13: OS Color 13 |
| PRICE: | $999.99 | 7999 CNY ($1152) |
| Hug | SAMSUNG: | OPPO: |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs OPPO Find N2. design
Both phones are made of metal and glass. To be fair, the Find N2 also comes in a veggie leather version, which is the model we tested. However, both are different types of wrinkles. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 is a horizontally foldable device, while the Find N2 is a vertically foldable phone. Both have a box-like structure with flat sides.
Both phones have curved edges and feel very different in the hand. The OPPO Find N2 is significantly heavier at 233/237 grams (depending on the variant) than the Galaxy Z Flip 4 at 187 grams. That's not surprising considering it's a different kind of foldable phone with more screen and battery. When unfolded, the Find N2 is significantly shorter, wider and slightly thicker than the Galaxy Z Flip 4. When folded, the Find N2 is significantly longer, slightly wider and thinner than the Galaxy Z Flip 4.
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has two rear cameras, while the Find N2 has three cameras. The design of the reverse camera module is also different. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 comes directly on the back of the phone and is not part of the larger camera module. The main screen of the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is smaller than the main screen of the Find N2, while the deck screen is much smaller than the secondary panel of the Find N2. The two phones look and feel very different in the hand. The Find N2 feels a lot heavier, but both feel like premium devices.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs OPPO Find N2. advertisement
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has a 6.7-inch foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X FullHD+ (2640 x 1080) main display. It's a 120Hz panel and supports HDR10+ content. This display also reaches up to 1200 nits of brightness. The foldable display of this phone is 1.9 inches wide and offers a resolution of 260 x 512. It is a Super AMOLED panel protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+. It has a 60Hz refresh rate.
In contrast, the OPPO Find N2 has a 7.1-inch FullHD+ (1792 x 1920) AMOLED LTPO main display that can be folded. It's a 120Hz panel and supports HDR10+ content. It reaches a peak brightness of up to 1550 nits. The phone's secondary screen measures 5.54 inches and is a FullHD+ (2120 x 1080) panel. It's protected by Gorilla Glass Victus and offers a 120Hz refresh rate up to 1350 nits at peak brightness. Both Find N2 screens offer a touch sampling rate of 480Hz.
However, the home screen looks great on both phones. They are quite sharp and offer excellent viewing angles. The colors are bright and deep black. The point is that the main panel of the Find N2 looks brighter, while there are also less noticeable creases. It also offers a higher sampling rate, which is noticeable. The Galaxy Z Flip 4's flip screen beats the Find N2's secondary panel. Sharper, offering a much higher refresh rate, much sharper, and more. Of course, these two screens are clearly not meant to be used in the same way. Overall, the Find N2 excels in the display department.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs OPPO Find N2. perform
Both phones are powered by very powerful SoCs, some of the best mobile chips in recent years. Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is used in both phones. Not only is this processor very powerful, it also consumes a lot of power and is not even as hot as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. It shows what it can do on almost every phone I've used, at least the ones we've used. I used it. is used and the same applies to these two devices.
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 combines this chip with 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 flash storage. The Find N2 combines this with 12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 flash storage. By the way, we are using a model with 12 GB RAM. However, the performance of both smartphones is very good. They are both resourceful in every way. This applies to normal daily use of opening/closing apps, taking photos, surfing the web, editing images, editing videos, etc. The same goes for gaming, as both were able to run almost everything we tried without issue.
One thing to note is that the Find N2 comes with Chinese software. You need to download Google Play services by installing Google Play Store APK. After doing that, everything works fine, although there are some limitations with this software regarding background apps and the like. In terms of performance and stability, both are very good.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs OPPO Find N2. battery
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has a 3,700 mAh battery, while the Find N2 has a 4,520 mAh battery. The Find N2 obviously has a bigger battery as both have a bigger screen. The secondary screen is actually much larger than the Galaxy Z Flip 4's enclosure. Battery life is actually pretty good for both phones, so nothing to worry about. At least it's good for us.
We managed to push the Galaxy Z Flip 4 continuously for the past 7 hours. The Find N2 actually did a little better, breaking 8 hours a few times, but also consistently breaking the 7 hour mark. Your mileage may vary, but there are many factors to consider here. Depending on what apps you use, what your signal strength is, what screen you use the most, whether you play games or not, etc. By the way, we rarely play games with this device. We do this for verification purposes only, so keep that in mind.
Well, as far as charging goes, things are pretty good. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 supports 25W wired charging, 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse charging. The Find N2 offers 67W wired charging and 10W reverse wired charging. The Find N2 charges much faster, but the phone doesn't offer wireless charging. What it does offer is a charging brick in the box, which we can't say about the Galaxy Z Flip 4.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs OPPO Find N2. Camera
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has two cameras on the back, a 12-megapixel wide-angle main camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera. In contrast, the OPPO Find N2 has a 50-megapixel wide-angle main camera, a 48-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera, and a 32-megapixel telephoto camera. Both phones do a good job of taking photos and videos, but there are some differences.
The Find N2 is generally more color accurate than the Galaxy Z Flip 4. However, this is why many prefer the Galaxy Z Flip 4's photos. They often come out too full and sometimes too full. Both phones offer plenty of detail in daytime shots, but the Find N2 steals the show in night shots. There are simply more detailed recordings with less noise.
The OPPO Find N2 also nails the HDR scene, but the Galaxy Z Flip 4 isn't bad in this regard either. The Find N2 sometimes tends to fade blacks in low light, though not often. The Find N2's ultra-wide camera performed better overall, but had a narrower field of view than the Flip 4's. The Find N2's telephoto lens was rarely used. The main camera is much better, while the telephoto camera only offers 2x optical zoom. Video recording is good on both phones, but not the best.
audios
Both phones are equipped with a set of stereo speakers. Both sets are very good, although the Find N2 is superior, much superior in fact. However, the speakers on both phones are well balanced and perform well even with bass-heavy titles. We don't have any major complaints about the speakerphone audio output, both phones performed well.
What you won't find here are audio jacks for both devices. You can always use the Type-C port for wired audio connections. Otherwise, both phones are equipped with Bluetooth. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 offers Bluetooth 5.2, while the OPPO Find N2 comes with Bluetooth 5.3 support.
