Midterms 2022: Republicans Big Tech Revenge Era Is About To Begin
Over the past four years, Republicans have unfairly portrayed themselves as victims of massive tech censorship, with some prominent conservatives banned from social media platforms.
While there is some legitimacy in their complaints, they also believe that companies are receiving a concerted effort to silence their voices by algorithmically removing their content. They believe views on the COVID-19 pandemic have been filtered in favor of the Democrats. They undoubtedly believe that Big Tech and the mainstream media are conspiring to influence the 2020 election by censoring and limiting stories about the president's son, Joe Biden.
And if they don't check, they'll do it all over again in 2024.
With the GOP expected to take control of the House of Representatives and possibly win the Senate, the party is planning an all-out assault in response.
While the party, even with control of both houses, won't accept any accounts after President Joe Biden, there are a few ways to try and get back to Big Tech. From hearings to investigations, the House GOP will likely focus on paying everyone from Meta to Google to TikTok.
They are angry that they have been called disinformation artists. That their memes are not retweeted, that their emails are spam, and that the companies they run are occupied by liberal elites who despise their party.
Article 230 dominates their agenda. Section 230 is part of a 1996 law aimed at protecting online publishers from liability for what users post on their platforms. It's considered the foundation of the modern internet, but Republicans believe that social media companies violate the law in several ways, especially when they algorithmically moderate and distribute content and act as publishers rather than platforms.
Republicans now want to deprive social media companies of Section 230 protection from lawsuits, presumably to obstruct the reach of Donald Trump Jr .. they have limited offensive or conspiratorial assignments to keep the number of followers artificially low.
They have allies in the Democrats and, for various reasons, they also want to change the way the statute works. Although the partnership has yet to be established, Republicans already have the accounts for hearings and panels.
Republicans outlined a roadmap for revising Section 230 before taking over the House of Representatives. The idea of a free and open Internet, privacy and content moderation will lead to destruction.
Every besieged Republican seems to have a specific piece of the statute they want to repeal, with bills or measures backed by who's who in the GOP. Rep. Jim Jordan (D-Ohio) wants to crack down on companies that censor "constitutionally protected" language. Representative. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) wants to "prevent companies from blocking or preventing access to legal content". Representative. Rep Greg Pence (R-Indiana), brother of former Vice President Mike Pence, wants to remove companies that sell counterfeit goods on their platform from the letter. In all, members of the Republican Energy and Trade Committee have proposed 11 different "exemptions" that would violate Section 230, all vague enough to be used as threats, but perhaps too inconsistent to be included in the replacement legislation.
Others want the law to be completely repealed.
Law on the modernization of Internet content and policies It was proposed at a time when Republicans were calling for disinformation policies on COVID-19 and censorship in the 2020 election. It would remove all Section 230 protections from platforms that actively reduce information or alter user input, such as when Twitter verified then President Donald Trump.
The law removes protections for "any decision, arrangement or action taken by a provider or user of an interactive computer service to restrict the access or availability of material provided by an information content provider".
The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the bill an "unconstitutional mess" when it was introduced and a coalition of tech groups signed a letter urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject the bill.
Lindsey Graham's (RC) bill never got out of commission, which could set the stage for what Republicans will do in the new year. In the Chamber of Deputies, deputy. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) Introduced a similar bill that would have excluded companies that block users or restrict access to their websites from the protections of Section 230 and could sue technology companies that they forbid them.
While this may aim at retaliation against Big Tech, empowering the largest companies could have a negative effect, as they will be the only places that can withstand the multitude of lawsuits each platform faces.
But, coincidentally, before banning free speech online, their crusade will consist of hauling tech company executives before Congress to answer for alleged crimes.
The incumbent party has the power of summons, which Democrats have used for the past two years to build an antitrust case against Alphabet, Amazon and others. But Republicans' concerns about hearings have been less and less subtle, using them to ask whether Google will allow "fanatical anti-police policies" or how advertising works.
However, with a majority in the House of Representatives, Republicans can promote an anti-competitive agenda by asking CEOs why the praise for QAnon has been withdrawn. Republican impeachment hearings would have had double the show and no substance.
It is based on a vengeful faction bent on punishing tech companies for what they see as years of Silicon Valley censorship. The Republican-controlled Chamber could initiate public retaliation.
They also want to take on the anti-census cloak, but only for their party leaders. It's a lawsuit that Republican state lawmakers are already pushing, with Texas and Florida leading the way.
Two states passed new laws to prevent candidates or officials from deleting or removing social media posts. The laws impose fines on companies that do this, which in Florida can be as high as $ 250,000 per day. The Florida law, which was proposed after then-President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter, could soon face the Supreme Court. The Republican ruling paves the way for national legislation that could allow Congress to decide how social media companies monitor their users.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) said the law provides Florida residents "protection from the Silicon Valley elite," stating that "when corporate censors inconsistently apply the rules to discriminate in favor of the ruling ideology of Silicon Valley, will now be arrested. " responsible".
More than 100 similar bills have been proposed across the country, according to the New York Times .
At the heart of Silicon Valley's "ruling ideology" are liberal views, best exemplified by Twitter and Facebook that silenced a New York Post article on Hunter Biden's laptop months before the 2020 election. of Florida, social media platforms cannot remove or denigrate the content of "news companies" of a certain size.
The story was briefly censored on social media and dismissed as a hoax by mainstream news.
But when more details surfaced, the obscene contents of Hunter Biden's laptop turned out to be true, exonerating Republicans. Now, nearly all Twitter and Facebook executives involved in blocking history links are called before Congress to explain how Biden failed in the 2020 election.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives can also do what Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr has requested and investigate TikTok, a matter in which he has already expressed interest.
Despite its popularity, TikTok has so far escaped the wrath of Congress. But with increasing pressure from conservatives to ban or crack down on the app, it could also take place in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives, which will be staunchly anti-Chinese.
In July, after a powerful BuzzFeed article on TikTok, House Republicans demanded proof that US user data is not stored in China, where the app's parent company is based. The move follows an in-depth investigation of the popular social media app by US officials over the summer.
Perhaps the only technology platform that is beyond their control is the current version of Twitter. When Elon Musk's Twitter purchase was finalized last month, Republicans said they were open to a censorship-free platform, arguing that free speech had been curtailed in the past. Musk has been praised for releasing his ideology on the platform and is expected to bring back right-wing accounts that have been banned so far.
Or maybe not. He has already angered some of them for being arrested by human rights activists for content moderation and has yet to restore their accounts.
Christopher Mitchell, director of advocacy for the Local Self-Help Institute, said he thinks the Republican hearings will be a sight.
"This is a party that is more interested in being in the news than doing anything through legislation," he told the Daily Dot. "So I'm more concerned that they are trying to disrupt things through hearings."
This means that Big Tech is about to have a great fireworks display.
We scan the internet so you don't have to.
Sign up for the Daily Dot newsletter to get the best and worst of the web delivered to your inbox every day.
